Gurmeet Kaur v. Tej Kaur Alias Ranjit Kaur & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.3316 of 2016 Date of Decision.09.05.2016 Gurmeet Kaur .......Petitioner Vs.

Tej Kaur alias Ranjit Kaur and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. A.S. Jattana, Advocate for the petitioners.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The defendant is the appellant. The defendant who had admitted to the character of the property as ancestral wants to withdraw from that admission on the plea that the advocate misguided him and stated that without his instruction. Such kind of contention cannot be permitted to be taken against his own counsel. If there is a plea of fraud or collusion by the counsel against the party, the defendant will have independent remedy in the manner known to law. Amendment in the pleading cannot be permitted in the manner in which it is sought withdrawing an admission.

2.

The application for amendment is rightly rejected and I find no reason for interfering with the same. The revision petition is dismissed.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE May 09, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.05.10 12:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document