Sukhwinder Kaur v. Manjit Kaur & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.3317 of 2016 Date of Decision.10.05.2016 Smt. Sukhwinder Kaur .......Petitioner Vs.

Manjit Kaur and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. J.K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The Court while disposing of application brought by the defendant to summon the call details of the witnesses said to have been made with the defendant has observed that there is no previous statement of witness which is sought to be confronted and if it is necessary, the defendant may bring the call details himself at his evidence. The counsel points out that it is possible to put any question to test the veracity of the witness. It is open to the defendant to test the veracity of any statement but if he wants any document which is not in his custody, the Court is not bound to secure the document for the benefit of the defendant. It will be open for the petitioner to secure the document which he wants to rely in his own turn of the evidence. The order passed by the court below is perfectly justified and there is no scope for interference.

2.

The revision petition is dismissed as vexatious. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE May 10, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.05.12 11:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document