Gurpreet Singh & ANR v. Sukhdev Singh & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.M. Nos.5248-49-CII of 2015 and C.R. No.3061 of 2014 Date of Decision.18.03.2015 Gurpreet Singh and another .......Petitioners

Versus

Sukhdev Singh and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Kamal Narula, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Puneet Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the respondents.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) C.M. No.5248-CII of 2015 Application is allowed.

The case is preponed for hearing today itself. C.M. No.5249-CII of 2015 Application is allowed as prayed for.

C.R. No.3061 of 2014 The civil revision is disposed of as having become infructuous in view of the representation made by both the counsel that the suit is said to have been withdrawn on the basis of compromise entered between the parties.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 18, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.03.20 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document