Abdul Aziz v. M/S Oerlikon Blazers Coating Industries Ltd. And Another

C.R. No.3357 of 2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.3357 of 2016 Date of Decision.11.05.2016 Abdul Aziz son of Sh. Wazuddin Ahmed .....Petitioner Vs.

M/s Oerlikon Balzers Coating Industries Limited and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

There can be no prejudice to the petitioner for impleadment being allowed in a case where a third party claims himself to be an employer and the respondents already on record have also claimed that it is third party who was the employer. The petitioner, who is the workman, has contended that he is the employee of only respondent No.1 and 2 and the third respondent who is now brought on record is wholly an unnecessary party.

2.

In the line of defence taken by the persons who are said to be employers that they are not petitioner's employers but it is only the third respondent who was brought on record was the employer, it will be appropriate and just that the petitioner's right is assessed in the presence of the person who is claimed to be the employer. No prejudice can be caused to him. The order impleading the third party is PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.05.12 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

C.R. No.3357 of 2016 -2justified and I will find no scope for interference. 3.

The revision petition is dismissed.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE May 11, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.05.12 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document