Punjab National Bank v. State Of Haryana And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP No.1302 of 2020 Date of Decision: 17.01.2020 Punjab National Bank ......Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and Ors.
.....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present:
Mr. Arvind Rajotia, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJIV SHARMA,J A writ of Mandamus is sought directing respondent No.2 to decide application (P.2) preferred by the petitioner under Section 14 of the Securitilization & Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for brevity "the Act") for taking physical possession of the secured assets/mortgaged property as detailed in the present petition.
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the grounds raised, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the application (P.2) within a period of three weeks from today and render the necessary assistance to the petitioner to enable it to take over the possession.
(RAJIV SHARMA) JUDGE (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU) JUDGE January 17, 2020 manoj Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2020.01.20 14:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document