Raunaq Ram v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 1211 of 1994 Decided on : 28.07.2015 Raunaq Ram @ Raunaq Singh . . . Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL PRESENT: Sh. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Advocate for respondents No.3 & 5.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The challenge in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is to the notifications issued under Sections 4 & 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short 'the Act') dated 10th October, 1979 and 08th September, 1980 respectively.

2.

After arguing for sometime, when the Bench was not agreeing with the learned counsel for the petitioner, it was prayed that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to claim benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 on the ground that the said notifications have lapsed as the petitioner continues to be in possession.

JAWALA RAM 2015.08.06 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No. 1211 of 1994 - 2 - 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies available to him in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (REKHA MITTAL) July 28, 2015 JUDGE J.Ram JAWALA RAM 2015.08.06 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh