Surinder Kumar v. Harmanprit Singh And ORS

Manoj Kumar 2018.03.13 11:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3270 of 2013 (O&M) Surinder Kumar ....Petitioner

Versus

Harmanprit Singh and Ors.

....Respondents Date of Order: 08.3.2018

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.M Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Satyaveer Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 9. AMIT RAWAL, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that in writ petition bearing CWP No.18924 of 2009 rendered by this Court, the petitioners were relegated to take remedy in accordance with law either by filing suit or application for partition of the property and therefore the order dated 27.2.2013 (P.7) impugned herein would be inoperative thereby rendering the present petition infructuous.

Said order produced by learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record, a copy of which has been given to counsel opposite. In view of aforesaid, present petition is rendered incapable of any further relief being granted.

March 08, 2018 `(AMIT RAWAL) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No