Paramjit Kaur v. Mangal Dass And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.3410 of 2016 Date of Decision.13.05.2016 Paramjit Kaur .....Petitioner Vs.

Mangal Dass and another ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Bhrigu Dutt Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner is aggrieved that his objection regarding the competency of the guardianship petition filed in the Court at Hoshiarpur as being not maintainable has not been decided for the last four years. I invoke the good sense of the Judge to consider the petition as early as possible and dispose if of expeditiously.

2.

The revision petition is disposed of with the above observations.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE May 13, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.05.17 14:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document