Kiran Arora And ANR v. Lallu Yadav And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.3417 of 2016 Date of Decision.16.05.2016 Smt. Kiran Arora and another .....Petitioners Vs.

Mr. Lallu Yadav and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. R.C. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The order passed by the Court below is set aside and the amount is directed to be paid immediately to the petitioners. As regards the amount due to parents, there need be no direction for deposit in bank as held by the Supreme Court in H.S. Ahammed Hussian Vs. Irfan Ahammed AIR 2002 (SC) 2483. The same issue has been dealt by this Court on various occasions in Satnam Singh Vs. National Insurance Company and another 2005(4) RCR (Civil) 393; Smt. Sita Devi Vs. Hasan Mohammad etc. 2006(2) RCR (Civil) 215; and Dharam Pal Vs. Hoshiyar Singh and others 2007(5) RCR (Civil) 806. I do not think the respondent-insurance company could in any way be prejudiced by the manner of direction given and therefore, I dispense with notice to the respondents.

2.

The revision petition is allowed.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE May 16, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.05.19 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document