Gajjan Singh And Others v. State Of Punjab And Another



 2023:PHHC:123744

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-2291-2019 Decided on: 20.09.2023 Gajjan Singh and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Aditya Partap, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab.

Ms. Paramjit Kaur, Complainant in person.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 02.03.2007 City Barnala, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, District Barnala 120-B IPC and Sections 13(1) (Punjab) (g), 13(2) of PC Act.

1.

Petitioners, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC to quash the FIR and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. 2.

State counsel, on instructions from ASI Amarjit Singh, submits that the present petition for quashing of FIR has rendered infructuous because after investigation a cancellation report has been filed for the second time. 3.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that even earlier cancellation report was submitted but re-investigation was ordered and matter is hanging fire from the last 15 years, now petitioner wants to travel to Canada and pendency of this FIR is coming in his way.

4.

Be that as it may, it is clarified that the concerned Magistrate expedite this matter and take a final decision by end of this year. Till that time, it is clarified that the pendency of this FIR shall has no bearing of the petitioner in any manner, whatsoever and shall be inconsequential till the final decision taken by the Magistrate. Jyoti 2023.09.22 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

 

 2023:PHHC:123744 5.

Petition is allowed partially to that extent in the terms mentioned above. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 20.09.2023 jyoti3 Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti 2023.09.22 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document