Arpana v. State Of Punjab And ORS

CRM-M-3233-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3233-2021

Reserved on: 29.07.2022

Date of Pronouncement: 14.09.2022

Arpana

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab & others

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Amitoj Singh Dhaliwal, DAG, Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 27.4.2019 GRP Jalandhar 420/465/467/468/471/170 IPC The petitioner, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, has come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person. 2.

During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2.

3.

After that, the petitioner came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, impleading the aggrieved persons as respondents. 4.

On 2.3.21, the aggrieved person Sewa Ram (R-2) and Surinder (R-3) appeared before the JMIC, Jalandhar and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 9.3.21, although the present parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat, the ASHWANI KUMAR 2022.09.14 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original

CRM-M-3233-2021 statement of aggrieved respondent Yog Raj (R-4) was not recorded due to his absence.

ANALYSIS & REASONING:

5.

Since all the victims did not state about their no objection to the compromise and also the reasons which led to the compromise, as such this court cannot proceed further in this matter.

6.

Given above, the petition is dismissed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file a fresh petition and there would be no necessity to re-examine respondents nos.2 and 3 and the accused, whose statements stand recorded. The copies of the statements along with report would suffice. Petition dismissed in the terms mentioned above, with liberty reserved. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE September 14, 2022 AK Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

ASHWANI KUMAR 2022.09.14 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original