Chiman Lal Uppal v. Virender Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP-200-2019 Date of Decision: April 12, 2019 Chiman Lal Uppal .....Petitioner

Versus

Virender Singh ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr.Sandeep S.Mann, Sr.DAG,Haryana.

........

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) The contempt petition is filed for non-compliance of the order dated 14.11.2018.

Reply is filed. As per the said reply, the order has been complied with. The refixation of the pay of the petitioner has been done vide Annexure R-2 and the payment in respect of the arrears have also been paid vide order dated 29.03.2019, Annexure R-3. In this view of the matter, no useful purpose would be served in continuing with the contempt petition. The same is hereby dismissed. The rule issued against the respondent(s) stands discharged. However, in case there is any discrepancy in the amount so paid by the respondent, the petitioner is at liberty to file the representation, which shall be decided in accordance with law.

April 12, 2019 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2019.04.22 11:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh