Anant Pal Singh Mann v. Allahabad Bank & ORS

C.R. No.3235 of 2014 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.3235 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision.03.07.2015 Anant Pal Singh Mann .......Petitioner

Versus

Allahabad Bank and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pawan Malik, Advocate for respondent No.1.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) C.M. No.12544-CII of 2015 With the consent of both the parties, the main case is preponed and taken up today itself.

Application is allowed.

C.R. No.3235 of 2014 1.

The revision petition is against an order accepting the petition for rejection of plaint. Rejection of plaint constitutes a decree under the definition of Section 2(d) of the Civil Procedure Code which is appealable decree and not revisable. The petitioner is at liberty to present appeal against the order which is impugned before the competent forum and if there is any delay in preferring such appeal, the petitioner is entitled to seek condonation of delay under Section 14 of PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.07.07 15:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

C.R. No.3235 of 2014 (O&M) -2the Limitation Act by setting out appropriate reasons. The Court will consider if such an application for condonation of delay is filed and pass appropriate orders.

2.

The revision petition is disposed of with the above observations.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 03, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.07.07 15:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document