Raj Kumar Alias Rajkumar v. State Of Haryana

2024:PHHC:020484

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-2719-2024 Date of Decision : February 14, 2024 RAJ KUMAR ALIAS RAJKUMAR -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA -RESPONDENT

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

Present:

Mr. P.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for Mr. Rajeev Dev Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Bhupender Singh, D.A.G., Haryana.

*** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1.

Through the instant petition, as instituted under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail, in case FIR No.255 dated 27.11.2023, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 186, 283, 307, 323, 332, 353, 379B, 506 of the IPC (Section 333 of the IPC added subsequently), registered at P.S. Jhojhu Kalan, District Charkhi Dadri. 2.

After addressing arguments for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the instant petition, however, with liberty to surrender before the learned trial Court concerned and to make an application for bail before the latter, which may be directed to be decided expeditiously.

3.

Leave granted.

4.

Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, with liberty to the petitioner to, within a month from today, surrender before the learned trial Court concerned and thereupon, if he DEVINDER YADAV 2024.02.15 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-2719-2024 2024:PHHC:020484 makes an application before the latter for grant of bail, the latter shall decide the same most expeditiously, preferably within two days, but, after affording adequate opportunity of hearing to the opposite party concerned. (KULDEEP TIWARI) February 14, 2024 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2024.02.15 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment