Panna Lal Yadav v. State Of Ut Chd
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:- 07.05.2024 ....Petitioner(s)
Versus
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :
Mr. Dinesh Maurya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, Public Prosecutor for UT Chandigarh. ***** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) 1.
The present petition under Section 482 CrPC has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing of the impugned order dated 08.01.2016 (Annexure P-3) passed by learned !
"
#$ #$ ! %&'!()*+)*(( !
! !$! !%$)( %,#! %! %$$ !"#$ #"-#! !./ 0!%$! #.!!$! !0 %1!0!
%$ ) ! $! %$ ! ,% #! 0!%$! # .1! # $ %10$!%#!% ! !+(*()*)'0
!./# % "#!0!%$!
# 00! !$#!% $, $ #!# !2 !..%$ !, #!
.1 ##!0!%$! # /!0% !#!% $%10$!%#!
% ! !+(*()*)'
-2- + ! $!. % !% # $% 0!#!,#$ %10$!%#!% ! !+(*()*)'"#!0!%$! # 00! !.!,% !
#!% $# %!0% !#!% ' ! & $ #!% !%,0 %!!$
%$+(*()*)'"#!,%%-$
% ! - 0
!
!
"#"$"$% &' ( )*+, - .
/ # )
0
+
1
'2 &' ( )*,
34 56 7
.. 8 )) 9:
/*
7 ; %'
$""3 <4
(
#
- .;1
.
;
=:
7
(
7
!
(
-3- ( $":
$"""";* 1 / '
9: > 3 4!!0$ $5!-#!,##!0!%$! # !/00! ! $#!% $, $ #!# !2 !.6 !/.%$ %$ !2!$%#!
% ! !31.01.2024"0
!./# % "#!0 !
!$0!%$ %-!
#!% ! ! 08.01.2016 (Annexure P-3)"0
!./! $!
!
"#$ # ! !$#!$! 1. $! 5!% ! !+(*()*)' #! !./%$, 1! 7.
The petition stands allowed.
(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 07.05.2024 S.Sharma(syr) i) Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?
Yes/No