Hassan Mohd And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

 



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.





 Date of Decision:19.01.2024



....Petitioners

VERSUS

   




 ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate  ******* KARAMJIT SINGH, J.(Oral) 1.

Petitioners are praying for direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to provide protection to their life and liberty from the hands of private respondents No.4 to 8.

2.

In the petition, it has been stated that both the petitioners are into live-in-relationship which has been opposed by private respondents No.4 to 8 who are related to petitioners No.1 and 2. 3.

Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 got married with respondent No.8 but they are having strained relations and petitioner No.1 started living with petitioner No.2 and they are into livein-relationship against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 8 who are extending threats to the life and liberty of the petitioners and the petitioners have already gave representation dated 13.01.2024 (Annexure P-3) to respondent No.2 but the police authorities failed to take any action on the basis of the said representation. Counsel for the petitioners further submitted that he will be satisfied if necessary action is taken by Priyanka Thakur 2024.01.20 13:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document the authorities on the basis of the aforesaid representation.

  

  

!

"#$$"

 4.

Mr. Neeraj Sheoran, DAG, Haryana appearing for the official respondents submits that in case any such representation is pending, the concerned authority will look into the matter and take action in accordance with law.

5.

In view of above, without going into the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with direction to Superintendent of Police, Nuh, Haryana to consider representation dated 13.01.2024 (Annexure P-3) and to take action if so warranted in accordance with law in case there is any threat perception to the petitioners. 6.

However, any observations made in this order will not be construed as an expression of opinion on the validity of the relationship of the petitioners. It is also made clear that respondents No.4 to 8 are at liberty to avail appropriate remedy available to them under law against the petitioners. In case the petitioners have committed any offence, law will take its own course.

$ $

   
 


%&'& &'(  

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No






Priyanka Thakur 2024.01.20 13:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document