Puran Singh v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 241-1 Date of decision: 21.07.2025 Puran Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE


Present:

Mr. Luvinder Sofat, Advocate, for the petitioner.
 

   ****


, J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioner is seeking regular bail under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 in case FIR No.906 dated 13.11.2024, under Sections 18B, 27A and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985, registered at Police Station Shahabad District Kurukshetra.

     

  



 

  

   
 !

 " 



 

    #$%% &  

"

 $  ' (#  %(() 

        *      
 !

    

 



 *+



 $ 

  

 "$ &   



  

 

 

 

  

 "   

&   $ *   *  
  !

      3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits petitioner was falsely implicated in the present case because apart from the disclosure

statement of the co-accused, there is no evidence to connect the petitioner to the said contraband. He further submits petitioner is in custody for the last 8 months and 01 day as under trial. Trial is likely to take time for its conclusion and continuous detention of the petitioner would not serve the ends of justice, therefore, petitioner be released on regular bail. 4.

Notice of motion.

5.

 

  , accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Learned State counsel vehemently opposes the prayer for grant of regular bail to the petitioner. He has filed the custody certificate in the Court today, which is taken on record. As per custody certificate, the petitioner is in custody for the last 08 days and 01 day. 6.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

7.

In view of the above submissions of learned counsel for the parties and considering the custody period undergone by the petitioner and the fact that apart from disclosure statement there is no evidence on record to connect the petitioner to the contraband, the continuous detention of the petitioner would not serve the ends of justice. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, this Court deems it fit to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner during the pendency of the trial. 8.

Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on her furnishing requisite bail bonds, surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned.

9.

However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner misuses the concession of bail, the State would be at liberty to seek cancellation of their bail.

(
 )

 21.07.2025 anil Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No