Gurpreet Singh Alias Gopi v. State Of Punjab
CRM-M-4572 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-4572 of 2021 DATE OF DECISION :- February 22, 2021 Gurpreet Singh alias Gopi
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Tejinder Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. *** The case has been taken up through Video Conferencing. By way of filing the present petition, petitioner Gurpreet Singh alias Gopi son of Shri Joga Singh, aged about 35 years, resident of village Uppal Khalsa, Police Station Noormahal, District Jalaldhar, presently residing at Via Maestri Del Lavoro No. 4, 37047, San Bonifacio, Italy, who has been declared as a proclaimed offender in case F.I.R No. 298 dated 17.12.2007 under Sections 307, 506, 148, 149 IPC (Section 323 IPC added later on) and Sections 25, 27 of the Arms Act registered with Police Station Banga, District Nawanshahr seeks quashing of the F.I.R as well as the order declaring him proclaimed offender.
This petition is not maintainable since in a judgment passed by a coordinate Bench in case titled 'Mehnga Singh versus State of Punjab 2002(1) CLJ (Criminal) 302' it was observed that when an accused has been declared as a proclaimed offender petition against the order under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable, the accused should first move the Court PARVINDER SINGH 2021.02.22 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CRM-M-4572 of 2021 who had declared him a proclaimed offender and even an objection against validity of proclamation is required to be raised in the first instance before the Court which issued the proclamation and power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is not to be exercised in favour of a person who is absconding or avoiding service. In the judgment 'State of Madhya Pradesh versus Pradeep Sharma 2014(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 269' the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has observed that when an accused is absconding and has been declared as a proclaimed offender in terms of Section 82 Cr.P.C. then such accused should not be granted anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the trial Court and move an application for regular bail. In the event of petitioner doing so within a period of 15 days from today then the trial Court would make earnest efforts to dispose of the said application for regular bail expeditiously.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE February 22, 2021 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2021.02.22 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh