Surinder Kumar Singla v. State Of Haryana And ANR.

CR No. 4655 of 2010 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 4655 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 06.02.2015 Surinder Kumar Singla ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH 1.

Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?

Present:

Mr. B.S. Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, DAG, Haryana for respondents no. 1.

Mr. Durgesh Aggarwal & Mr. Yogesh Goyal, Advocates for respondent no. 2.

R.P. Nagrath, J. (Oral) CM No. 2177-CII of 2015 Application is allowed as prayed for and affidavit of Sh. Lalit Siwach, Secretary, Housing Board, Haryana alongwith calculations, is taken on record.

CR No. 4655 of 2010 The balance amount outstanding in terms of principle laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gurpreet Singh vs. Union of India, 2008 (2) RCR (Civil) 207 shows that as on 06.02.2015, the balance amount of ` 2,22,929/- is outstanding. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that JITENDER KUMAR 2015.02.09 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CR No. 4655 of 2010 -2calculations made by the respondent-State are in accordance with the principle laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gurpreet Singh's case (supra).

In view of the above, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-State to deposit outstanding amount as calculated in the calculation sheet filed with CM No. 2177-CII of 2015, before the Executing Court within four weeks and the Executing Court would disburse the same to the petitioner/rightful claimants.

February 06, 2015 ( R.P. NAGRATH ) jk JUDGE JITENDER KUMAR 2015.02.09 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh