Neha Bhayana v. Lalit

-1Civil Revision No.3408 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3408 of 2018 Date of decision: 21.05.2018 Neha Bhayana .......Petitioner versus Lalit ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - Ms. Alisha Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Aditi Girdhar, Advocate, for the respondent.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Ms. Aditi Girdhar, Advocate, appears on her own on behalf of the respondent and files power of attorney on his behalf. The same is taken on record.

Through instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been laid to order dated 02.05.2018 (Annexure P-4) of the Principal District Judge, Family Court, Karnal. Relying upon Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur, 2017(4) R.C.R.(Civil) 608 (S.C.), learned counsel for both the sides have jointly prayed to condone the period of six months for second motion to record joint statement of the parties seeking divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Ravinder Singh 2018.05.22 13:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document In view of above, trial Court is directed to condone the

-2Civil Revision No.3408 of 2018 statutory period of six months for recording joint statement of the parties on second motion.

Disposed of.

(Ramendra Jain) May 21, 2018 Judge R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No.

Ravinder Singh 2018.05.22 13:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document