High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/3642/2005dismissed

(O&M) Tilak Raj v. Phul Chand Verma And Others

2016-01-14Mr. Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR No.3642 of 2005 Date of decision: 14.01.2016 Tilak Raj ....Petitioner

Versus

Phul Chand Verma and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - Mr. S.C. Chhabbra, Advocate, for the petitioner. PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has informed him that matter has already been disposed of by the trial Court, therefore, this petition has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. In case, the statement is found to be incorrect, petitioner will be at liberty to move an application for revival of this petition.

(Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal) Judge January 14, 2016 R.S.

RAVINDER SINGH 2016.01.15 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document