← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/384/2015dismissed

Abdul Rehman And ANR. v. Promila Lumb And ORS.

2015-02-25Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CR-384-2015 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Civil Revision No.384 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 25, 2015.

Abdul Rehman and another ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

Promila Lumb and others ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Sarju Puri, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) CM-4116-CII-2015 Application is for placing on record copy of sale deed dated 27.03.2012 Annexure P-5 and also for exemption from filing certified copy thereof.

Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions and copy of Annexure P-5 is taken on record.

CR-384-2015 After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition with prayer that petitioners be allowed reasonable time for vacating and handing over the possession of the demised premises to respondent No.1-landlady. SACHIN MEHTA 2015.02.26 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CR-384-2015 -2In view of request made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The revision petitioners are allowed period upto 24.08.2015 to vacate and hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to respondent No.1landlady, subject to the following terms:- (i) The petitioners-tenant will pay/deposit the entire due rent upto 28th February 2015 within two weeks.

(ii) They will keep on paying/depositing the advance rent/mesne profits of subsequent months upto 24.08.2015 on or before 7th day of each month.

(iii) They will file affidavit before the executing Court within three weeks giving details of entire payment of rent/mesne profits and undertaking to vacate and hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to respondent No.1-landlady on or before 24.08.2015. In case of default of any of the above terms, respondent No.1-landlady will be entitled to execute the order of ejectment forthwith. The order has been passed in the absence of respondent No.1 to avoid unnecessary delay and expenses. A copy of this order be conveyed to respondent No.1. In the event of respondent No.1 having any objection, she may file a petition to that effect. On receipt of the petition, the same be listed for hearing.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) February 25, 2015.

JUDGE Sachin M.

SACHIN MEHTA 2015.02.26 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh