Rajinder Kumar v. Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.346 of 2018 Date of Decision.26.04.2018 Rajinder Kumar ......Petitioner Vs Santosh ........Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:
Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Namit Kumar, Advocate for the respondent.
-.- AMIT RAWAL J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner had not complied with the order dated 09.02.2018 passed by this Court by not making payment qua interim maintenance @`6000/- per month and on account of the non-payment of the maintenance, the Family Court vide order dated 21.03.2018 has dismissed the petition for non-prosecution under Order 9 Rule 8 CPC. Copy of the order dated 21.03.2018 has been given to this Court.
In view of such eventuality, I am of the view that no cause of action survives for consideration in the revision petition. The present revision petition is dismissed.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE April 26, 2018 Pankaj* Whether reasoned/speaking Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2018.04.27 13:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document