High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/2851/2020allowed

Suraj Singh And Another v. State Of Ut Chandigarh And Another

2020-09-25Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M-2851 of 2020 (O&M) Date of decision : September 25, 2020 Suraj Singh and another ....Petitioners versus State of UT, Chandigarh and another ....Respondents Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh Present :

Mr. Malkit Singh Hundal, Advocate for Mr. Amjad Khan, Advocate, for the petitioners Mr. Manish Jain, APP, UT Chandigarh for respondent no. 1 Mr. Raman Sihag, Advocate, for respondent no. 2 Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) The matter has been taken up through Videoconferencing on account of outbreak of pandemic COVID-19. Report dated 12.2.2020 of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh has been received after recording statements of accused Suraj and Syed Rajaul as well as complainant Sumneek Singh Sandhu and the learned court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is an outcome of voluntariness, free will and without any coercion or undue pressure. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and in view of the DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2020.09.29 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Criminal Misc. No. M-2851 of 2020 (O&M) -2fact that compromise will go a long way in resolving the personal dispute and to bring about personal harmony and would be for the betterment of future lives of the parties and more-so the offences for which the accused have been booked are not of very serious nature and in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh vs State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others vs State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and in view of which the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No. 98 dated 18.4.2019 under sections 323, 147, 148, 149 IPC, registered at Police Station East Sector 26, Chandigarh and all consequences arising thereof are quashed, qua the present petitioners. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

( Fateh Deep Singh ) September 25, 2020 Judge 'tiwana'

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No Whether Reportable ?

Yes/No DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2020.09.29 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.