High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/3789/2005disposed of

Vinod Kumar v. Ravinder Kumar & ORS.

2025-12-05Ms. Justice Ramesh Kumari1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR-3789-2005 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 05.12 . 2025 VINOD KUMAR ......PETITIONER VS.

RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS.

.....RESPONDENTS CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Advocate for Mr. G.V.S. Behl, Advocate for the respondents. **** RAMESH KUMARI , J.(ORAL ) Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Advocate for Mr. G.V.S. Behl, Advocate appeared and has submitted that the demised premises had already been vacated by the respondent and the cause of action no more survives. None appears for the petitioner.

A perusal of the order dated 01.04.2004, passed by learned Rent Controller reveals that the writ petition filed by the petitioner herein was allowed, however, on filing of first appeal, the order of learned Rent Controller was reversed and ejectment application was dismissed. Since none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner and as per submission made by learned counsel for the respondents that the demised premises had already been vacated, the revision petition stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.

December 05, 2025 (RAMESH KUMARI) Kusum JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2025.12.09 11:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh