Rattan Singh v. Sudan Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.401 of 2016 Date of Decision.21.01.2016 Rattan Singh .......Petitioner Vs.

Sudan Singh ........Respondent

Present:

Mr. Narender Kaajla, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

It is needless exercise for person to arrive before this Court to complain that the Court ought not to have closed the evidence. The right must be taken as available for party to apply to the same Court setting out the reason as to why his presence could not be there at the time when the case was posted and seek for reopening the case and for opportunity to let in further evidence. If such request is made, the Court will consider the same and pass appropriate orders. 2.

The revision petition is disposed of on the above observations.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 21, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.01.25 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document