High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/3648/2017disposed of

Sunita Rani v. Sukhjinder Singh And ANR

2018-02-20Mr. Justice Arun Monga1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.3648 of 2017 Date of Decision.20.02.2018 Sunita Rani ......Petitioner Vs Sukhjinder Singh and another ........Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Impinder Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

-.- AMIT RAWAL J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the plaint in which the interim order was passed and against which the revision petition was directed, has itself been rejected, therefore, no cause of action survives for consideration.

In view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for consideration in the revision and the same is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE February 20, 2018 Pankaj* Whether reasoned/speaking Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2018.02.23 13:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document