Sonu Sharma v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. 747 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.01.2022 Sonu Sharma .......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Harpal Preet Singh Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana (Through Video Conferencing) **** SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner (Sonu Sharma) instituted an application, appended with the petition, as Annexure P-1, before the Superintendent of Jail, District Prison, Yamunanagar, wherethrough, he applied for the grant of facility of parole.

2.

However, without the apposite application being decided by the competent authority concerned, the petitioner has moved this Court, for his being granted the facility of parole.

3.

Consequently, the extant petition becomes premature, and, also is not well constituted. Therefore, at this stage, the petition is permitted to be dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

The Superintendent of Jail concerned, is directed to, forthwith, forward the afore application (P-1) to the competent authority concerned, and, the latter shall, within four weeks hereafter, after considering the same, pass a speaking order thereon, in accordance with law. DINESH KUMAR 2022.01.27 14:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

C.R.W.P. No. 747 of 2022 (O&M) -25.

It is needless to emphasize, that in case thereon(s), a decision adverse to the petitioner becomes recorded by the competent authority, thereupon, it is open to the petitioner to recourse all the available remedies, in accordance with law.

January 27, 2022 ( SURESHWAR THAKUR ) 'dk kamra'

JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2022.01.27 14:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document