Malkiat Kaur v. State Of Punjab And ORS

CWP-6046-2002 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-6046-2002 Date of Decision: 03.09.2025 MALKIAT KAUR

...Petitioner

Vs.

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- None for the petitioner Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to depute her for Upper School Course.

2.

The writ petition was filed in 2002. Notice of motion was issued on 12.04.2002, however, no interim relief was granted. 3.

Learned State counsel submits that petitioner was deputed for Upper School Course in 2003. She was promoted as SI on 26.12.2006. She has retired on 31.08.2009. Thus, the petition has rendered infructuous.

4.

In the wake of statement of Learned State counsel, the instant petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to petitioner to move appropriate application within three DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.09.04 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-6046-2002 -2months from today, if cause survives.

5.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 03.09.2025 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.09.04 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document