Sunil Chopra v. Union Of India And Another

CWP-1292-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1292-2024 Date of Decision : 23.05.2024 SUNIL CHOPRA ... PETITIONER

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Mr.S.K.Bokolia, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Bhatia, Sr. Panel Counsel for the respondents-UOI.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to the respondents to appoint him on compassionate ground. 2.

Reply dated 22.05.2024 by way of affidavit on behalf of respondents is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at appropriate place.

3.

Mr. Sandeep Bhatia, Sr. Panel Counsel, at the outset, submits that application of the petitioner is under consideration, however, due to financial constraints, it could not be finalized. The case of the petitioner Anju Goel 2024.05.23 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-1292-2024 would be considered on priority basis as and when appointments are made. At present, all the appointments have been stopped. 4.

In the wake of statement of counsel for the respondents, the present petition stands disposed of. This Court is sanguine of the fact that respondent would consider claim of the petitioner expeditiously. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 23.05.2024 anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anju Goel 2024.05.23 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh