Shamsher Singh @ Sher Singh v. Jasbir Singh And ORS

C.R. No.4184 of 2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.4184 of 2016 Date of Decision.08.07.2016 Shamsher Singh alias Sher Singh .......Petitioner Vs.

Jasbir Singh and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Narinder Singh Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) The petitioner-defendant is aggrieved of the order dated 17.05.2016, whereby, his evidence has been closed. Mr. Narinder Singh Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner submits that in case, one opportunity is granted, he will conclude the entire evidence. I have heard the counsel for the petitioner-defendant and appraised the paper book and of the view that no doubt, the petitionerdefendant was negligent in concluding the evidence. However, in order to advance justice and prevent miscarriage of justice, I deem it appropriate to grant two effective opportunities to the petitioner to conclude the evidence.

Keeping in view the aforementioned observations, the impugned order is set aside and the petitioner-defendant shall conclude the evidence in accordance with law subject to payment of costs of `5,000/- which shall be condition precedent. If the costs is not paid as directed, the order passed PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.07.08 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document already by the court below shall stand restored.

C.R. No.4184 of 2016 -2The impugned order is set aside and the revision petition is allowed. A copy of this order be issued to the petitioner under the signatures of Reader of this Bench as the next date before the trial Court is 14.07.2016. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE July 08, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.07.08 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document