Vinod Bansal v. Inderpal Sikka And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3816 of 2017(O&M) Date of Decision: November 28 , 2019.

Vinod Bansal ...... PETITIONER (s)

Versus

Inderpal Sikka and another ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present:

Mr. B.R.Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

None for the respondents.

*****

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ***** LISA GILL, J.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, who is stated to be present in Court, states that the present petition is rendered infructuous. Possession of the demised premises has been handed over to the respondents-landlords.

Petition is disposed of, accordingly.

( LISA GILL ) November 28 , 2019.

JUDGE 'om'

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No OMKAR SINGH 2019.12.03 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh