High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/4218/2015dismissed
Parveen Chaudhary v. Jeewan Parkash
2017-05-09Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh1 pages
!"#"$%&%'()*
+,""'- .#- +/ "!%!%'"+ ,"+&.& ""0 ' +1 &- "&2'#"'!
( 34
5 5
+"&"'!( None for the petitioner.
Mr. Mukesh K. Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.
**** / - .#- +/6 + 7 Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the present revision petition has become infructuous as the main case has been decided. Dismissed as having become infructuous.
However, in case, the situation is otherwise, the petitioner is at liberty to move application for revival of the revision petition. )*
'""!.
√ Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No √ Whether reportable Yes/No Neetu Rani 2017.05.11 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh