Raheela v. State Of Haryana And Others





-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH




 Decided on: 30.01.2026 

......Petitioner
Versus
    

......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA

Present:



 
  


 
 


  







****
SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral)


The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for appointing a Warrant Officer to visit the spot i.e. Village Kukarpari, Police Station Jurheda, District Deeg, Rajasthan and to release detenues from illegal confinement of respondents No.4 to 8. 

In compliance of order dated 15.01.2026, reply by way of an affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police Punhana Nuh, District Nuh on behalf of respondent-State has been filed in Court which is taken on record.

3.

Learned counsel for the State submitted that statements of the petitioner as well as the detenues namely Rafiq and Nasir have been SONIA PURI 2026.02.04 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document





-2-

recorded wherein it is stated that the application was submitted by the petitioner due to some misunderstanding, however the detenues have been brought back by the Haryana/ Rajasthan Police. 4.

In view of the statement made, no further order is required to be passed and hence, the present petition is dismissed. (SUBHAS MEHLA)
JUDGE
30.01.2026
Sonia Puri Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO
Whether Reportable:

YES/NO
SONIA PURI 2026.02.04 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document