Arshad v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3788-2021 Date of Decision:30.06.2021.

Arshad

...Petitioner

vs.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

Coram :

Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.S. Walia.

Present:

Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pawan Kumar Longia, DAG, Haryana.

*** B.S. Walia, J. (VC) 1.

Case is being taken up for hearing through Video Conferencing due to Covid-19 pandemic.

2.

Prayer in the petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0111 dated 15.3.2014 registered under Sections 120-B, 147, 186, 188, 201, 279, 336, 379, IPC, 1860 (Section 147 IPC deleted later on) at Police Station Tauru, District Nuh.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that pursuant to the order of this Court dated 04.03.2021, the petitioner joined investigation, fully cooperated with the police, was released on ad interim pre arrest bail and that his custodial interrogation is not required.

4.

Learned Addl. A.G, Haryana, on instructions from ASI Karnail Singh, confirms that pursuant to the order of this Court dated 04.03.2021, the petitioner joined investigation, cooperated in the investigation, was released on ad-interim pre-arrest bail and RAJESH KUMAR 2021.07.01 16:50 i attest the accuracy and authenticity of this document

his custodial interrogation is not required.

CRM-M-3788-2021 [2] 5.

In view of the statement of the learned Addl. A.G, Haryana, order dated 04.03.2021, passed by this Court, is made absolute. The petitioner shall abide by the terms and conditions enumerated in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

6.

Petition stands disposed of in the aforementioned terms.

(B.S. Walia) Judge 30.06.2021.

'Rajesh'

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJESH KUMAR 2021.07.01 16:50 i attest the accuracy and authenticity of this document