Sukhdev Singh v. Gurdeep Singh And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.428 of 2016 Date of Decision.22.01.2016 Sukhdev Singh .......Petitioner Vs.

Gurdeep Singh and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Gagandeep Singh Sirphikhi, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The ex parte order against the defendant is set aside and the defendant is allowed to continue with the trial on the statement already filed. The objection is that earlier an application had been filed by the very same defendant as though they had not been served with summons and when an objection was taken pointing out to the fact that they had been actually served and they had engaged the cousnel and the statement was filed, the previous application filed was withdrawn and fresh application was filed admitting the fact of service but merely seeking for permission to set aside the order. The Court has allowed that. I do not find any prejudice as having resulted to the plaintiff to challenge the same in the revision petition.

2.

The revision petition is dismissed.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 22, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.01.27 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document