State Of Haryana And Others v. Ashwani Kumar Chaudhary
!" ##$$ %& "'(&)*"&!" +#! ! "
##$ "
#% (,#& !-.$,
"##$$ ('$. $,!-! "" ,!-,
"#!/*- 00000 #$& '() * +,**
1"##$ ! !$ 22!
$3"##$ ! &$ &4) " " $ " 4 )-! "&3" -& $-$, &", " !$ $3 " ##$ " $!$4 "$!&#"5&!3) &#) *&"
,'""4"$!""*&"&$!4)$4$ !3"!$ 4"$ " $"4##-! -$$-$4 $3"##$
"3$!&$ "##$$,' !!-'""!$ "# "!$4 $,'&$!4" 5&, "!$ !! !"##$"!!!!!) *6&$ ,"##$$$'!!"!$ 22 ! $3"##$!! (-.//0() 1"##$$"-"$$3!"5&!3) $! 3$ 7&!3 !!
8, '"4 " 4 !! " " # " #!4##!+#'"" "5& )" !")$
&& #-& ! !!
,
!- '(&),!)-
"4 $!4 $! &$1")9! !&$ "##$$&4)"" #! ' $ !
) " " 5& " #!"!4##!"# #& ! & '"$ " 5& '" ' '93 "!4#)! "# #& " "!43!"4 !*!" ,"'!'3 "3"# ""#!:"$$ 3+&$ *-$
- +&$,
2" !"+&$
2," &4)""&'""3 "3"# 5& '&$!45& !
8 !&$ "#!/*-&4)"" #!'$-!(&!!")$, " 3 $ ##) ! " #! "! ##$! " # #& "&3" ## "$ ! "-3 4 ##! &", " ' $! ##3&# # #'"$-!(&!! &"&4)" #$ ""#!43!$ " -!4 +&$
2,&)&"" # "#!' ;!&!+&$<4&' ;!&!+&$ , " 43 &46& ## ! " " #! ##3&# # 6&$ -!4 +&$=
2
! 2 1" #! ! ! $-! (& !! ! "- 4 ##! =
#&&"!-)&!4 " .-)"
> ! '" " ), " #! ' #$! $ '"$ $-! (& !! ' #$! $ < " $ >
, " #! 93 ##) #& "!##$! "!#"&3"##"$>" )'"$,4""-3)#$!= 3&$-'3! 4 *$' 8
1"'#/#! '$!#& !5!&"
8
&3""4 # #) +&$
2,'"4 "# )#$ '""4##!"3"
# ##$ 3"&3"##"$"4#!!" 4 ;!6&$"4# $! !'4 ")1"$-; +&$
2#!&!"&! "10. !" # $%&$ ' ( !$ ( )*+ - On subsequent appointment to a post of pay scale higher than or identical to Functional or ACP Pay scale in the same or any other department of Haryana Government where the application for the same has $ xxx xxx (ii) been submitted through proper channel, the pay shall be fixed― (a) at entry level pay of the post; or (b) equal to the corresponding cell if available in the functional level of the new post; or (c) at the next cell above the existing cell if the same cell is not available in the functional level of the new post." xxx xxx"
1" , -! ! !!
8, " # " #! ' #!!"# ' ;!4 33")$ !
3!# "#)$#
>##""##)"# #& "&3"'"$,, ?4 ' #) ! ?4 ' !&)1"#!"!##$!"&3" ## "$ ! "! 4 ##! " # #& "!4&3- #"##)#& !"'49 "- 8
<,$-!(&!!'3!" 4 !* )#$32 -,!!)!$ 8
43 !'3 # "3" " " 43 !' 4 " #! 1" , " ' &46&$ #)! " # #&
< $"&3" " ' 5& " #! = :! ! )" "$! &$"-' +&$
2$-!(& !! "! 4 3! " 4 ! *, " , " #!'&$!4$!##3&# # #'""5& 1"+&$
2#!&!"&! ,-.// $*# 0+ ' ' # / ( 1 $ # '% 23 [In the instances listed below, stepping up of pay shall not be admissible even if a junior Government employee is drawing more pay than that of senior Government employee:$ (a) xxx xxx xxx (b) xxx xxx xxx (c) xxx xxx xxx (d) xxx xxx xxx (e) Where a person is promoted from lower to a higher post, his pay is fixed with reference to the pay drawn on the lower post under rule 13 and he is likely to get more pay than a direct appointee whose pay is fixed under different set of rules.
For example, a Junior Scale Stenographer on promotion to the post of Senior Scale Stenographer gets his pay fixed under rule 13 with reference to the pay drawn on the post of Junior Scale Stenographer, whereas the pay of direct recruit Senior Scale Stenographer is fixed under rule 9. In such cases, the senior direct recruit cannot claim pay parity with the junior promoted from a lower post to higher post as seniority alone is not a criteria for allowing stepping up.
(f) xxx xxx xxx" >## )"4!3 +&$ "+&$
2"-&$!5& "3"# #)-@@- !&")#1"$4"!##4"" #) ' - $ ! ! 4 )/* ) &)4 - '-, " "!, " #!"!4&&-#'"5&!'"3" )! "# < :3)'""&4) $!*&$ "#!""-!4 +&$=
2>#&$!+&$="##3&# # #'" 5&#)4$)-")$ &'"4"" ! 5& 4$3 ) ! ! " # '"" " "- 4#)!##!")!'""# $ 4""$'!"3"#'"""5&!$! !'!$ +$-; ")#!&!4$'
"58. Instances where stepping up of pay of senior is admissible.- In case of any anomaly between junior and senior Government employee which shall not cover in the list of instances as laid down in rule 57 and satisfy the conditions given below shall be sent to Finance Department alongwith documents required under rule 59 through Administrative Department for consideration:$ (a) both the junior and senior Government employee should belong to the same cadre and the posts in which they have been promoted or appointed are identical and in the same cadre;
(b) the pay scale of the both lower and higher posts in which the junior and 2
senior Government employees are entitled to draw pay are identical; (c) the anomaly is directly as a result of the application of these rules." 1"#!!"5&,4"5!-") !"# !&$)$
<'
&!")!," #& 1" '4" !'3!$# $"$'#'$$""3"#> ##"'$ & 3 "!*"5&
8
<""43!'3"3"# ""'#> "5&!'"3"# ""43!'4 " + 4)!"5&!3) &#)*&" /
56 +6$#
/ 7 ,'")'")$3&)'!" '$!#&# # -' "5&!'3)# & ! &! " * $ ! ") "! &!
-&'"" 3"*& (9!"5&!3) 3"*& (9'&#"$!4 " &#)*&1"$-; 5&!3) &#)*&#!&!"&! "6. Therefore, it was a case where a junior was drawing more pay on account of upgradation under the ACP Scheme and there was an anomaly and therefore, the pay of senior was required to be stepped up. Hence, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court has rightly directed the appellants herein to step up the pay of the original writ petitioners keeping in view of pay scale which has been granted to the juniors from the date they have started drawing lesser pay than their juniors. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the High Court. No interference of this Court is called for."
*6&$ , " ##$ !)! 43 !-! ) 1"#!3)$$&##$$!#! &" #$
%
sandeep :"" #93/+! A/ :""+#4$ A/ =