← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaRFA/321/2022disposed of

Attar Singh (Since Deceased) And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

2022-05-23Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RFA No.321 of 2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.05.2022 Attar Singh (deceased) thr Lrs. and ors.

..Appellant (s)

Versus

State of Haryana and ors.

..Respondent (s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL PresentMr. Sarvesh Malik, Advocate, Mr. N.C. Kinra, Advocate, Mr. N.K. Malhotra, Advocate, Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Advocate, Mr. S.R. Hooda, Advocate, Mr. Sudhir Hooda, Advocate, Mr. Parveen Kaushik, Advocate, Mr. Kamal Mor, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate, Mr. Surinder Gaur, Advocate, Mr. M.S. Rana, Advocate, Mr. Sanjeev K. Aggarwal, Advocate, Mr. Ojas Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Tejas Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Anil Dutt, Advocate for Mr. S.P. Khatri, Advocate for the landowners. Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana and Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. P.S. Saini, Advocate for HSIIDC.

*** ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

CM No.705-CI 2022 The prayer in this application is to condone the delay of 611 days in filing the appeal.

Admittedly, the connected appeals arising from the same notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, are pending. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Imrat Lal and others vs. Land Acquisition Collector and others (SC) 2015(2) RCR (Civil) 437, Dhiraj Singh (deceased) thr. LRs vs. Haryana State and others, 2015(2) RCR (Civil) 507 and Jethu Ram (deceased) thr. LRs vs. Union of India and others, 2016(4) Law Herald 3166, has held that in such cases the delay be condoned subject to the denial of interest to the appellants for the period of delay. Hence, the application is allowed and delay of 611 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the ASHOK KUMAR 2022.07.08 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

RFA No.321 of 2022 appellants shall not be entitled to interest for the period of delay. CM No.707-CI of 2022 For the reasons mentioned in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, the application for bringing on record the legal representative(s) of Attar Singh (appellant No.1) is allowed, subject to all the just exceptions. Main Case For orders, see detailed order of the even date passed in RFA No.3149 of 2018 titled as Jaipal and ors. vs. State of Haryana and ors. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.

23.05.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) ashok JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No ASHOK KUMAR 2022.07.08 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document