Sucha Singh v. Dalip Kaur

CR No.4370 of 2015 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4370 of 2015 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.05.2018 Sucha Singh ... Petitioner versus Dalip Kaur ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Arun Kapila, Advocate for Mr. O.S.Batalvi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Singla, Advocate for the respondent.

***** Amit Rawal, J(Oral) There is written request on behalf of the petitioner on the ground that arguing counsel is out of station. The present revision petition is directed against the order dated 15.04.2015 (Annexure P-1) passed by the trial Court whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 in the suit claiming declaration that defendant - Dalip Kaur is not legally wedded wife of Malkit Singh (deceased) and also seek permanent injunction restraining the defendant and its representatives from alienating the suit property was dismissed. The aforementioned suit was filed on 18.09.2014. The miscellaneous appeal preferred before the Lower Appellate Court has also been dismissed. The revision petition is pending adjudication in this Court since 2015. It has not been apprised to this Court about status of the suit.

Sonia Bura 2018.05.17 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

CR No.4370 of 2015 (O&M) -2Instead of pondering from the ad interim application, plaintiff has liberty to seek the expeditious disposal of the suit as early as possible to get the final relief as no useful purpose would be served by keeping the revision pending. The injunction in fact was not to create 3rd party right which would be always subject matter of the lis. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. 10.05.2018 (AMIT RAWAL) sonia JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No Sonia Bura 2018.05.17 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh