Ram Kumar @ Rammu v. State Of Haryana

 






   

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH
 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.05.2022






...Petitioner

Versus





...Respondent

 

  


   
   


 





!



"

   





  
#






****

       

$ #

"

  

"

   



 !"




!
 #
%&
'

(()


*+,-*,*.
 #



 !

  
/"
0
1 !

0
 
!

 
.2)
.22
(34
((*
(-(
.*,5

(,3
&/ Vide order dated 08.02.2022 passed by this Court, ad interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner. 
!

 



"

   
 

"




 
 


08.02.2022

"

   

7 



 #  
Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Manoj Kumar, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for any further investigation.

MANGAL SINGH 2022.05.17 18:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

 






 
   I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 08.02.2022 granting ad interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the conditions envisaged in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.





   

 

 



8

 
   9"

 #:


;

9'

8

 
 "

  :



;

9'

MANGAL SINGH 2022.05.17 18:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment