Sunita v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. 769 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.01.2022 Sunita .......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Ankush Rampal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Beniwal, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab (Through Video Conferencing) **** SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of a mandamus hence directing respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to give protection to the life and liberty of the petitioner, and against any interference in the peaceful life of the petitioner being made at the behest of respondent No. 4. 2.

The learned State Counsel, does not have any objection, to an order being made by this Court to respondents concerned, to look into and decide through a speaking order, representation Annexure P-2. 3.

Consequently, this Court directs respondents concerned, to within three weeks hereafter, hence decide Annexure P-2, through a speaking order.

4.

Petition is disposed of.

5.

A copy of this order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

January 27, 2022 ( SURESHWAR THAKUR ) 'dk kamra'

JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2022.01.27 14:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document