Raman v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3390-2022
(O&M) Date of decision: 01.04.2022 RAMAN

...Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA .....Respondent 




  
 






        

    

 

****   
 






 

            ! "!   " #$% &

'()  )( *+ )*)' ,-
'.   
!  

!

/ 0
      123  )'*  /   14 $
5

   "

/

    )'

*1 )*))   0  
! 
 !  "!       %        

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR; that the alleged occurrence took place on 24.05.2021 whereas the present FIR was registered on 26.05.2021 i.e. after an unexplained delay of 2 days and that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.11.2021. He further submits that the petitioner has been indicted in the present case on the basis of the disclosure statement of the co-accused.

AMAN JAIN 2022.04.02 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-3390-2022
(O&M) -2On the other hand, while opposing the prayer for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, learned State counsel submits that the petitioner is a habitual offender having criminal antecedents, inasmuch as, apart from the present FIR, two more FIRs of similar nature have been registered against him and that too within a period of six months i.e. from May, 2021 till October, 2021.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The allegation against the petitioner are specific, direct and serious in nature. Moreover, as noticed above, pendency of 02 more FIRs of similar nature, speaks volumes about the conduct of the petitioner, who is a habitual offender. Therefore, possibility of the petitioner, indulging himself in similar crime, if enlarged on bail, cannot be ruled out.

In view of the above, no ground is made out to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner. Dismissed.

  
 








 01.04.2022
 



     

 





  

 AMAN JAIN 2022.04.02 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document