Kundan Lal & ANR v. Mahant Janki Dass & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.4470 of 2015 Date of Decision.17.07.2015 Kundan Lal and another .......Petitioners

Versus

Mahant Janki Dass Chela Mahant Garib Dass Chela Mahant Uttam Dass ......Respondent

Present:

Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner is unnecessarily before this Court. He could have filed an application under Order 8 Rule 9 CPC to controvert the pleadings which had been brought through the rejoinder. The petitioner will have such a liberty.

2.

The revision petition is disposed of with such a liberty. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 17, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.07.20 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document