Panjko Devi And ANR v. Lukhwinder Kaur Duggal And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.4513 of 2015 Date of Decision.23.07.2015 Panjko Devi and another .......Petitioners

Versus

Lukhwinder Kaur Duggal and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the revision petition has become infructuous and seeks for dismissal of the same as such.

2.

The revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 23, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.07.24 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document