Shiv Kumar Sharma v. U.T. Chandigarh

 




  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH
  (O&M) Date of decision: 17.03.2022
 
 

...Petitioner

Versus

U.T. Chandigarh

...Respondent

     
     

   

      



     

 ! "

  #$ ""         ****     

 

 

Through the instant petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 212 dated 03.11.2020 registered under Section 452 IPC, at Police Station Sector-31, District Chandigarh.

Vide order dated 09.08.2021 passed by a Coordinate Bench, ad interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner. %

 

  



 &   

 



 

  09.08.2021 



 '  

"  Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Surjeet Singh, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and he is not required for any further investigation.

MANGAL SINGH 2022.03.17 19:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

 




 
 I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 09.08.2021 granting ad interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the conditions envisaged in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

    

      ( 



 )

#"* +

), ( 



  & * +

), MANGAL SINGH 2022.03.17 19:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document