Reetu Rani And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2024:PHHC:029154

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (117) CRWP-620-2024 Date of Decision:-29.02.2024 Reetu Rani and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN ****

Present:

Mr. Sushil K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Anmol Malik, DAG, Haryana.

**** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents.

2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have compromised the matter and they do not wish to pursue the present petition and accordingly prays for withdrawal of the same. 3.

However, it is pertinent to record that petitioner No. 1 is a married woman with respondent No. 4 and all the allegations made in this petition against respondent No. 4 are found to be incorrect and has not been supported by any cogent evidence and shall not be available with the PARUL 2024.03.04 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document petitioners.

2024:PHHC:029154 CRWP-620-2024 -24.

In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. 5.

It is made clear that filing or pendency of this petition or any order/direction passed in this petition shall not be an alibi or defence to the petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any illegal activity and the respondent-Authorities shall take appropriate action, in accordance with law.

(ALOK JAIN) JUDGE February 29, 2024 Parul Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No PARUL 2024.03.04 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document