Poonam v. Commssioner And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.4746 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision.27.07.2016 Poonam wife of Shri Vinod Kumar .......Petitioner Vs.

Commissioner under Employees Compensation Act, Circle, Karnal and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Nitin Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty of this Court to withdraw the revision petition to avail the remedy of appeal as envisaged under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and shall also seek condonation of delay as per the provisions of Section 14 of the Limitation Act.

The revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE July 27, 2016 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned No Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.07.28 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document