Sonu v. State Of Haryana

2024:PHHC: 036176

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3726-2024 Date of decision: 13.03.2024 SONU .... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI

Present:

Ms. Gursimran Walia, Advocate for Mr. Baljeet Beniwal, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Rupinder Singh Jhand, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) On 24.01.2024, the following order was passed:- "The prayer in the petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.327 dated 15.11.2021 under Sections 452, 307, 379-B, 302 and 34 IPC registered at P.S. Sadar Palwal as the petitioner has been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C.

The counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C and as such his custodial interrogation is not required.

Notice of motion for 13.03.2024.

In the meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Trial Court within a period of one week from today and shall be admitted to interim bail to the satisfaction of the Trial Court."

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in pursuance of the afore-mentioned order, the petitioner has surrendered before the Trial Court and has been released on interim bail. KUSUM 2024.03.14 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD

CRM-M-3726-2024 -2In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court.

It is expected that the petitioner shall not absent himself from Trial without sufficient cause.

Disposed of.

(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 13.03.2024 Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2024.03.14 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD