← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/4272/2021dismissed

Majeet Alias Romio v. State Of Haryana

2021-03-22Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal3 pages

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Date of Decision: 22.03.2021 Manjeet alias Romio ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Lather, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Kirti Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

This is third petition for grant of regular bail to the petitioner pending trial in a criminal case arising from FIR No. 25 dated 17.02.2019, registered under Section 398 and 401 IPC and Section 25 & 54 of the Arms Act, 1959 (Section 29 of the Arms Act, 1959 was added later on) at Police Station Pillukhera, District Jind.

The first petition, filed by the petitioner for grant of regular bail, was dismissed by this Court on 22.11.2019 along with the bail petition of a co-accused with the following order:

By this order two petitions, CRM-M-46317-2019 and CRMM-38215-2019 filed for grant of bail pending trial to each of the petitioner arising from criminal case FIR No.25 dated 17.2.2019 registered under Sections 398, 401 IPC and Sections 25, 54 of Arms Act at Police Station Pillukhera, District Jind and Section 29 of Arms Act ( added lateron) in CRM-M-46371-2019 and in FIR No.25 dated 17.2.2019

registered under Sections 398, 401 IPC and Section 25of Arms Act at Police Station Pillukhera, District Jind (in CRM-M38215-2019) shall stand disposed of. As per the case of the prosecution, petitioners alongwith other co-accused had blocked the passage of a vehicle and forced it to stop with an intention to commit dacoity. From each of the petitioner, a country made pistol with live cartridges has been recovered. Petitioner-Sudeep is facing two previous criminal cases details whereof are as under:- Sr.

No.

FI R No.

Dated Under Sections Name of Police Station Status of the case 1.

117 14.5.2016 285, 506, 148, 149 IPC, 25 of Arms Act Julana Pending trial and fixed for 25.11.2019 2.

318 4.11.2016 302, 34, 201, 216, 176 IPC Julana Pending trial and fixed for 25.11.2019 Against petitioner-Manjit @ Romio there are following cases:- Sr.

No.

FIR No.

Dated Under Sections Name of Police Station Status of the case 1.

23.10.2013 398,401 IPC, 25 Arms Act City Jind Acquitted on 13.2.2015 2.

1.9.2014 302, 120-B IPC, 25 Arms Act City Jind Pending trial and fixed for 20.11.2019 3.

27.12.14 396, 341 IPC Narnaund, Distt. Hisar Acquitted on 10.5.18 4.

16.1.15 386 IPC 25 Arms Act Safidon Acquitted on 20.10.17 5.

16.2.17 148, 149, 186, 188, 307 IPC 25 Arms Act Pending trial and fixed for 12.12.19 6.

21.8.17 42 Prison Act Civil Lines Jind Pending trial and fixed for 20.12.2019 26.1.18 323, 506 IPC Civil Lines, Pending trial and

Sr.

No.

FIR No.

Dated Under Sections Name of Police Station Status of the case Jind fixed for 20.11.2019 8.

30.5.18 25 Arms Act Sadar Narwana Pending trial and fixed for 20.11.2019 9.

27.10.18 148, 149, 323, 452, 506 IPC City Jind Pending trial and fixed for 27.11.2019 10.

5.5.19 25 Arms Act Julana Pending trial and fixed for 15.11.2019 In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to grant concession of regular bail to the petitioners. Hence, both the petitions are dismissed".

The second petition was dismissed as withdrawn on 27.10.2020.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, although, made a sincere attempt, however, failed to draw attention of the Court to any fresh ground for grant of regular bail.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, no ground to grant regular bail to the petitioner is made out. Hence, the petition is dismissed. However, the learned trial Court is requested to make a sincere endeavour for expeditious disposal of the trial.

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge March 22, 2021 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No