← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/1301/2024disposed of

Chirag Raman v. State Of Haryana And Others

2024-02-06Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya2 pages

CWP No.1301 of 2024 -1- 2024:PHHC:015777 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No.1301 of 2024 Date of Decision : 6.2.2024  Chirag Raman ..... Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. R.S. Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana --- TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J. (ORAL): The petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned letter/notification Annexure P-11, vide which the petitioner was declared ineligible, and also the impugned result dated 7.6.2022, Annexure P-12. Further, a writ of mandamus has been sought directing the respondents to consider the petitioner for appointment as Mechanic Electronics Instructor (Theory) in Skill Development and Industrial Training Department, Haryana, against advertisement no.12 of 2019, in category no.28, being a meritorious candidate. It is also prayed that the respondents be restrained from issuing appointment letters pursuant to the selection/result dated 7.6.2022. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was successful in the written test and called for scrutiny of documents as well. However, he was declared ineligible vide notification Annexure P11, without citing any reason. Despite representations having been submitted, including the one dated 8.7.2022, Annexure P-13, no reason Ashwani Kumar 2024.02.09 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.1301 of 2024 -2- 2024:PHHC:015777  for declaring the petitioner ineligible has been conveyed. 3.

Learned State counsel, appearing on advance notice, contends that the said representation will be decided and reasons for declaring the petitioner ineligible will be conveyed to him by the second respondent/ Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission, within two months. 4.

In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof.

5.

Ordered accordingly.

 (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 6.2.2024 Ashwani   

           Ashwani Kumar 2024.02.09 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document